NSA telecom surveillance archive: Jewel v. NSA, et al.

Former National Security Agency (NSA) analysts, and others, discuss the scope of the agency’s domestic telecommunications surveillance program in statements issued from September through November, 2012, in Jewel v. NSA, et al. (United States District Court of Northern California).

We’ll let the words of these informed individuals speak for themselves.

“I agree with Mr. [Thomas] Drake’s assessment that everything changed at the NSA after the attacks on September 11. The prior approach focused on complying with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The post September 11 approach was that the NSA could circumvent federal statutes and the Constitution as long as there was some visceral connection to looking for terrorists.”

– former NSA analyst J. Kirk Wiebe.

“The NSA has the ability to do individualized searches, similar to Google, for particular electronic communications in real time through such criteria as target addresses, locations, countries and phone numbers, as well as watch-listed names, keywords and phrases in email. The NSA has the ability to do individualized or small scale searches for particular electronic communications in real time. It also has, or is in the process of obtaining, the capability to seize and store most electronic communications passing through its U.S. intercept centers.”

– former NSA analysts J. Kirk Wiebe, Thomas Drake and William Binney.

Complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Norther District of California on September 17, 2008.

Download (PDF, 2.86MB)

Mark Klein (former AT&T technician) declaration of support.

Download (PDF, 811KB)

J. Kirk Wiebe (former NSA analyst) declaration of support.

Download (PDF, 773KB)

Thomas Drake (former NSA analyst) declaration of support.

Download (PDF, 359KB)

William Binney (former NSA anaylst) declaration of support.

Download (PDF, 498KB)

J. Scott Marcus (attorney) declaration of support.

Download (PDF, 2.3MB)

Marcus exhibits A through D.

Download (PDF, 2.03MB)

Marcus exhibit E.

Download (PDF, 1.7MB)

Marcus exhibit F.

Download (PDF, 2.99MB)

Marcus exhibit G.

Download (PDF, 1.92MB)

Marcus exhibits H through K.

Download (PDF, 1.27MB)

Marcus exhibits L through N.

Download (PDF, 1.02MB)

Marcus exhibits O through Q.

Download (PDF, 1.34MB)

Marcus exhibit R.

Download (PDF, 816KB)

Marcus exhibit S.

Download (PDF, 1.83MB)

Marcus exhibits T through V.

Download (PDF, 787KB)

Marcus exhibits W through Y.

Download (PDF, 870KB)

Cindy Cohn (Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney) declaration of support.

Download (PDF, 3.38MB)